Philosophy of Discipline Essay

Essay Question In order to find by how things real argon, one must understand the filters by dint of which one perceives the world.I believe that we perceive and in that locationfore know. We perceive through emotions, language and reason. These argon also known as the ways of knowing. Thus, it is appropriate to use the Woolmans twelve ways of knowing to talk ab tabu perception. Reality is what we see, hear, smell, touch, smell and feel. It is what we observe around us using our senses and feelings. However, how do we know that we are really seeing reality and non our perception or something that our disposition stand accept and process?There are color in that our midpoint cannot see for example ultra-violet and infrared-red. These colors are undetectable to the human eye and then we cannot see them. What we perceive is a clean Singapore. How do we in reality know that Singapore is not littered with invisible rubbish? Of course, there are special devices that allow us to see these two colors and come up that there is no such rubbish. However, you can never be for certain that there are no other colors invisible to our naked eye. The things that we have always believed to be square(a), because we have seen it with our own eye may actually be non-existent so can we trust our eyes?Is what we see real? My desk is in the study room. This statements so called proof is based on unproven premises and therefore nothing is true and reality is not real. This is skepticism. When can we be sure? We can only be sure when we begin with the simplest, most prefatorial premises which is certainly impossible to doubt. This can be summed up into these trine lines what we see is not real, you cannot be sure whether you are day dreaming or not, there is only thing that you can be certain of and that is your consciousness of your own existence. Xenophanes once said that we can always learn more than we know, except we can never be sure that we have reached any fin al truth. Thus is seeing really believing or believing is really seeing? allone has behaves differently because everyone is taught or course of studymed differently. Some people never let a vulgar newsworthiness slip their lips others say it all day. This is due to the different programs stored in their sense of right and wrong. For example, if your pose who bought you up teaches you that stealing is wrong, you would perceive that stealing is wrong and thus your conscience pricks you when you are tempted to steal. However, what if the person who passes the information to you is ignorant and teaches you what he thinks is right and these resign out to be wrong?This boils down to authority and acquaintances. The drug dependence problem is because of incorrect perception. If your father brought you up teaching you that drugs is good for you, you lead the perception that drugs is good and take drugs without it pricking your conscience, eventually fall into addiction of drugs. Ther efore, are you able to trust your conscience or the persons who brought you up and helped program your conscience?Dreams seem real and convincing. Is it possible that you withdraw your dreams as you remember past experiences? This seems absurd, exclusively sometimes you can mistake a dream for reality (dreams often seem very real), as a answer you may also mistakenly store that reality-look-alike thought in your brain. You mistakenly made these memories and you can no longer be confine your memory to real-life experiences, which in itself are not very convincing and have its areas for skepticism, but fake and pure materials from your imagination.Every argument or proof proceeded from premises, which it did not itself establish. Trying to demonstrate the truth of those premises by other arguments or proofs had to be based on undemonstrated premises. Therefore, no ultimate ground of induction could ever be reached. What a valid argument proves is that its conclusions follow from its premises, but it is not at all the same as proving that those conclusions are true. Every valid argument starts with an if if p is true then q must be true. That leaves open the question of whether or not p is true. The argument itself cannot prove that because it has already assumed it and to have assumed already what sets are out to prove would be to move in a vicious circle. science can be simplified into two basic questions. Is your perception true? Why is it true or false? Then you can await yourself how do you perceive? We know through our five senses? These senses send impulses or messages to our brain from the outside word. The brain then interprets and creates the real world in our brain. How does the brain interpret the impulses or messages? It can be done through past experiences, social, cultural, religious communities, spatial familiarity for example patterns and shapes, biological limitations, existing cultivation structures, language and self perception such as how we think or what we believe.It is indeed doubtful whether anyone could live based on complete perception, or if they could, whether such a life would be worth living. However, this defensive structure of perception, if refutation it is, is not a logical argument. In practical life, we must luff a middle course between demanding a degree of deduction that we can never have and treating all possibilities as if they were of equal cargo when they are not.References1. Longman Longman Dictionary Of Contemporary English (International Students Edition) Longman Group Limited 1978, 19952. Bryan Magee The novel Of Philosophy Doling Kindersley Limited 1998, 2001